<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paid Posts Balancing Act</title>
	<link>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/</link>
	<description>Review and Blogging Thoughts</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: helen</title>
		<link>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>pablo - I heard if you're creating less than 20 ops, it's better to offer PPP direct. You can take your pick which are the relevant blogs for your blog. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pablo - I heard if you&#8217;re creating less than 20 ops, it&#8217;s better to offer PPP direct. You can take your pick which are the relevant blogs for your blog. <img src='http://blog.eepoh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablopabla</title>
		<link>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>pablopabla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I've previously advertised for my food blog a few months back thru PPP. I created 5 opps. I had no referral traffic from all 5 blogs. And frankly, some of the entries are worse than crap! And these are all ang moh blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve previously advertised for my food blog a few months back thru PPP. I created 5 opps. I had no referral traffic from all 5 blogs. And frankly, some of the entries are worse than crap! And these are all ang moh blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ah Pek</title>
		<link>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Ah Pek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I won't opt out totally, but I sure won't be letting them dictate me too much.

My other blog is full of reviews but I do maintain a good ratio and the reviews there are almost all related to my blog's topic or niche if you like, so most of the time, I treat those reviews as part of my blog and not written solely for money. I too, have declined many assignments that goes too far out of topic.  It is original and informative for those who likes to read about the topics that I am writing there. 

My reasoning is if I have two post that I have been paid to write but on different topics on the related niche, why can't I place them back to back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t opt out totally, but I sure won&#8217;t be letting them dictate me too much.</p>
<p>My other blog is full of reviews but I do maintain a good ratio and the reviews there are almost all related to my blog&#8217;s topic or niche if you like, so most of the time, I treat those reviews as part of my blog and not written solely for money. I too, have declined many assignments that goes too far out of topic.  It is original and informative for those who likes to read about the topics that I am writing there. </p>
<p>My reasoning is if I have two post that I have been paid to write but on different topics on the related niche, why can&#8217;t I place them back to back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shireen</title>
		<link>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Shireen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Quality advertisers ("quality" for me means advertisers who pay more than the min per post) have the same mindset as quality readers...they are both looking for quality blogs. Such advertisers do not want the integrity of their ads compromised cos they can and are willing to pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality advertisers (&#8221;quality&#8221; for me means advertisers who pay more than the min per post) have the same mindset as quality readers&#8230;they are both looking for quality blogs. Such advertisers do not want the integrity of their ads compromised cos they can and are willing to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pelf</title>
		<link>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>pelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.eepoh.com/2007/09/06/paid-posts-balancing-act/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>And the things is, they're adding some clauses to their TOS because they knew that their existing posties would stay by them because truth is, PPP pays. They could easily say that, "If you're not happy, you may opt out" because they knew that most won't voluntarily opt out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the things is, they&#8217;re adding some clauses to their TOS because they knew that their existing posties would stay by them because truth is, PPP pays. They could easily say that, &#8220;If you&#8217;re not happy, you may opt out&#8221; because they knew that most won&#8217;t voluntarily opt out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

